Skip to content
UNBUILTTHE METHOD
MENUBEGINCLOSE

A Personal Essay

The Heart Beneath the Armor

On truth, regulation, and the still small voice

By Jeff Hatch

On September 17, 2017, I was arrested crossing into New Hampshire with heroin. The next morning, federal agents came to my door. By then I had begun thinking about ending my life. I was not thinking about heart space or a still small voice. I was thinking about escape.

As a boy, I was tenderhearted and easily unsettled. I registered small shifts in people's moods and tried to work out what those shifts meant for me. I knew my family loved me. I also noticed how much easier closeness seemed after I had accomplished something. Over time, recognition and security became tangled together. I began to depend on doing well as a way of feeling welcome. No one had to give me that instruction. I learned it from the responses I wanted to keep receiving.

At Penn, football rewarded qualities I had already been developing for years. Constant watchfulness helped me prepare. Physical force gave my fear an acceptable outlet. My sensitivity could remain private while my size and performance spoke for me. I became a first-team I-AA All-American, and in 2002 the New York Giants selected me in the third round. Those achievements seemed to confirm that I had understood the world correctly. As long as I excelled, I had a place in it. I could describe my credentials with confidence. Apart from those credentials, my understanding of myself was painfully thin.

I spent years assuming that constant mental activity was evidence of intelligence. Before a conversation began, I had often rehearsed several versions of it, predicted objections, and prepared my defense. I watched people closely and called that perceptiveness. Sometimes I was paying attention. Other times I was searching for reassurance that nothing could catch me unprepared. I trusted my ability to anticipate trouble more than my capacity to endure it. Thinking became a refuge from the vulnerability of actually participating in my life.

I do not believe the head is the enemy. The mind is a gift. Mine carried me through the University of Pennsylvania, into the NFL, and into rooms where people needed clear thinking in moments of crisis. The problem begins when intelligence is recruited by fear. Then it rationalizes what the heart already knows is wrong, turning avoidance into strategy, control into responsibility, performance into worth, and anxiety into preparation. A capable mind can build a convincing argument for almost anything, including the choices destroying him. Mine did.

The back injury happened while I was preparing for the 2002 draft. I considered it almost entirely in terms of what it might interrupt. Workouts and evaluations were approaching, and I could not imagine allowing my body to slow the pursuit I had organized my life around. I responded to its limits by demanding more of it. Admitting that I needed care felt dangerously close to admitting that the future I wanted might not happen.

Prescription opioids seemed to answer both problems at once. They reduced the physical pain and eased my fear about losing football. Because I could continue training, I read the improvement in my performance as evidence that everything was all right. That mistake was easy to sustain. My ability to meet expectations concealed how dependent I was becoming on the means of meeting them. The more the medication helped me carry on, the less willing I was to examine what else it was doing to my life.

There would be a spinal fusion, a period of sobriety, and then a knee replacement that brought opioids back into my life. Eventually I was using heroin and trafficking it. During that same period, my public work involved recovery and connecting people with treatment. I had benefited from recovery myself and genuinely wanted others to receive help. I was also deceiving people and contributing to the suffering I claimed to oppose. Neither fact cancels the other. The difficult truth is that all of those actions belonged to me. I had become skilled at keeping them apart so I would not have to confront the person making both sets of choices.

I supplied myself with reasons to postpone that confrontation. I offered my work in recovery as evidence in my defense. I told myself I could stop before matters got worse, that the circumstances were unusual, that my knowledge of addiction somehow made my conduct different. Each explanation bought more time for behavior I already knew I needed to stop. Beneath the explanations, I recognized the betrayal of my own values. Conscience had become inconvenient, so I kept finding ways to talk over it.

In the crisis around my arrest, that habit of searching for a way out became a threat to my life. I had relied so completely on controlling circumstances that, when I could no longer do so, I struggled to imagine enduring them. I began to believe that ending my life was the only way to escape consequences I felt unable to face. That was the extremity of my fear, not a clear understanding of what remained possible.

Surviving left me responsible for a life I could no longer explain away. There was harm I would never be able to undo. No later achievement could retrieve the heroin I had put into circulation or erase the distress I had caused people who trusted me. Understanding my behavior mattered, but understanding did not settle what I owed. I had to acknowledge my choices without attaching a defense, accept their consequences, and follow through wherever a repair was possible. Making amends also required care for the other person; my desire to feel better could not justify causing fresh pain. Some consequences would remain beyond my reach. I would have to carry that knowledge without asking anyone to relieve me of it.

Shame kept drawing me back to the question of whether I could bear being myself. I could spend hours condemning the man I had become and still leave every damaged relationship unattended. Taking responsibility required me to direct my attention outward. Whose trust had I violated? Which choices needed to stop? Where could I offer something useful, and what would I need to do consistently for that offer to mean anything? I had once taken the force of my remorse as proof that I was changing. Eventually I understood how little another person could rely on a feeling inside me. They needed different conduct from me, maintained after the urgency of confession had faded.

I have spent more than twenty years in recovery rooms. I have watched faith save lives, including mine, and spiritual language become another hiding place. A person can say he has surrendered something to God while refusing to feel the grief, anger, fear, or shame beneath it. He can use forgiveness to skip the wound and prayer to close a moment that needs to remain open. The head loves spiritual concepts when they allow it to rise above the body. There was no honest path to the heart that did not pass through the past. What I refused to feel became tension, vigilance, control, craving, and distance. Truth had to come before quiet. Otherwise silence was not peace. It was suppression.

After my 2017 arrest, federal charges followed in 2019. COVID delays extended the case until sentencing in 2022. Throughout those years, plans with Lauren carried a question we could not settle: how much of our life together might incarceration interrupt? I felt that uncertainty physically. Some mornings I woke already braced, with nothing new to account for it. Seeing my attorney's number was enough to set off a response before I heard any news. Even beside Lauren, I could become so absorbed in what might happen that I failed to listen to what she was saying. The case occupied attention that belonged to our relationship. A possibility was taking things from us long before a judge had decided anything.

My expectations of suffering were producing suffering of their own. I slept poorly, had less patience, and offered the people I loved less of my attention. Elaborating another possible outcome never resolved the uncertainty. It only gave me another scene to dread. I began to see why reasoning alone had not helped: I was asking an already frightened body to settle down while continually supplying it with reasons to stay frightened. I needed to interrupt that process at the level of sensation.

I started with ordinary physical actions. I let my breathing slow and checked whether I was holding tension in my jaw or throat. I noticed the pressure beneath my feet and looked around the room instead of following another prediction. Walking, eating, and sleeping mattered too. I practiced allowing an uncomfortable sensation to pass without deciding that it announced a disaster. I reminded myself to distinguish the fear I felt from the danger actually present. Gradually I could acknowledge that the outcome remained unknown without treating that uncertainty as an emergency. The practice offered no assurance about my sentence. It gave me experience of getting through a difficult moment without fleeing it.

At sentencing, the judge expressed serious doubt that a substantial prison term could be avoided. My chest and throat constricted as I listened. I recognized the reaction from years of anticipating that day, and I was able to respond to it. I eased my breathing, released some of the tension, and felt the support of the chair. The decision was outside my control, but I could keep listening instead of becoming lost in terror. Ultimately, the judge imposed federal probation for three years, with no prison term. I received that mercy knowing it did not erase my responsibility. What I had practiced had given me no influence over his decision. It had helped me remain attentive while he made it, able to face the actual proceeding rather than another rehearsal of the worst.

Learning to regulate also changed how I responded to my thoughts. I could recognize a prediction without accepting it as knowledge. I could notice a familiar mental argument without having to finish it. When my attention wandered into fear, I practiced bringing it back without adding self-criticism to the problem. I still became anxious. Progress meant recognizing that state earlier and spending less of my life caught inside it.

An inward message does not deserve my trust simply because it arrives quietly. Fear can be subtle, and a wish can sound like certainty. I look at the conduct a message would require of me. My experience of God leads me to become more accountable, more willing to acknowledge limits, and more considerate of another person's freedom. It asks me to make an uncomfortable repair or offer help without securing recognition in return. The many descriptions attached to my life, from former NFL player to husband, father, and person with a felony conviction, cannot decide how I will act today. That decision belongs to the person I am when there is nothing to gain by appearing admirable.

What matters to me now is the interval between feeling threatened and deciding how to respond. I used to fill it almost immediately with an explanation, a defense, or an attempt to change the circumstances. Learning to settle my body has made that interval more available. I can examine what has actually happened and notice what I am adding to it. There may be something difficult I need to accept, or something I need to address. Neither becomes clearer while I am occupied with protecting myself from the fact that it exists.

I also have to be careful about what I call peace. It is possible to feel better because I have finally admitted something, and possible to feel better because I have found a convincing way to avoid it. The relief alone cannot tell me which has happened. I need to look at what follows. Am I more willing to listen? Have I become more specific about my responsibility? Can someone disagree with me without being treated as a threat? These questions keep the practice connected to the people affected by my choices.

The still small voice becomes useful to me here. I do not need to turn it into a prediction or claim that God has settled every uncertainty. I need to consider whether I am being asked to do something honest that I would prefer to postpone. Sometimes that means admitting that my account is incomplete. Sometimes it means asking for guidance and allowing the answer to challenge me. I can bring judgment and careful thought to that process without using either to dismiss what my conscience has already brought to my attention.

This is what I mean by living from the heart: becoming able to consider the truth without immediately preparing to defend myself against it. My mind has work to do once I have listened. There are decisions to make, obligations to meet, and habits to change. Fear will still be part of those moments. I no longer want to give it the authority to decide what I am willing to acknowledge. That is what becoming UNBUILT is all about for me: loosening the defenses that once seemed essential so I can meet my life with greater honesty, responsibility, and love.